Reform Party

Maret Maripuu

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

Terms served

1426

Policy votes

21.2%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 36%Against · 35%Abstained · 29%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

21.2%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 21.2

Present but silent % 21.2

Party loyalty % 99.9

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1426 − 1123) / 1426 = 21.2%

Registered 1426 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1426
For: 518 · Against: 605 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 233 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

15.5%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 15.5

Present but silent % 15.5

Party loyalty % 99.7

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1116 − 943) / 1116 = 15.5%

Registered 1116 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1116
For: 475 · Against: 468 · Abstain: 3 · Did not vote: 87 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

38.8%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 38.8

Present but silent % 38.8

Party loyalty % 99.2

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2557 − 1565) / 2557 = 38.8%

Registered 2557 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2557
For: 816 · Against: 749 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 421 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

50.0%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 50.0

Present but silent % 50.0

Party loyalty % 99.3

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2232) / 4466 = 50.0%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1152 · Against: 1080 · Abstain: 13 · Did not vote: 1595 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Kaja Kallas 100% agreement
Taavi Rõivas 100% agreement
Indrek Raudne 100% agreement
Kalle Palling 100% agreement
Aivar Sõerd 100% agreement
Marko Mihkelson 100% agreement
Andrei Korobeinik 100% agreement
Urve Tiidus 100% agreement

Votes most unlike

Urbo Vaarmann 11% agreement
Mihhail Stalnuhhin 17% agreement
Mailis Reps 23% agreement
Jüri Morozov 24% agreement
Indrek Saar 27% agreement
Kadri Simson 30% agreement
Sven Mikser 30% agreement
Viktor Vassiljev 32% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
16.11.2000	1. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	Läbirääkimiste lõpetamine	For
16.11.2000	462 SE	For
16.11.2000	5. parandus	For
16.11.2000	2. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	Läbirääkimiste lõpetamine	For
16.11.2000	288. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	287. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	286. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	285. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	284. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	266. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	265. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	264. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	263. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	257. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	255. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	250. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	248. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	247. parandus	Against
16.11.2000	244. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	243. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	242. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	241. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	240. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	239. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	238. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	234. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	233. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	232. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	229. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	227. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	224. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	223. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	221. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	220. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	219. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	218. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	210. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	209. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	208. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	206. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2000	205. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2000	204. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2000	201. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2000	192. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	190. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	189. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	181. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	174. parandus	Against