Reform Party

Paul-Erik Rummo

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

Terms served

1945

Policy votes

14.6%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 38%Against · 35%Abstained · 27%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

14.6%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 14.6

Present but silent % 14.6

Party loyalty % 99.1

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1945 − 1661) / 1945 = 14.6%

Registered 1945 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1945
For: 879 · Against: 782 · Abstain: 11 · Did not vote: 176 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

15.2%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 15.2

Present but silent % 15.2

Party loyalty % 99.5

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2064 − 1750) / 2064 = 15.2%

Registered 2064 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2064
For: 910 · Against: 840 · Abstain: 5 · Did not vote: 207 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

0.0%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 0.0

Present but silent % 0.0

Party loyalty % 100.0

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4 − 4) / 4 = 0.0%

Registered 4 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4
For: 4 · Against: 0 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

43.9%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 43.9

Present but silent % 43.9

Party loyalty % 92.4

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2507) / 4466 = 43.9%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1286 · Against: 1221 · Abstain: 155 · Did not vote: 1670 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Taavi Rõivas 100% agreement
Jürgen Ligi 100% agreement
Andrus Ansip 100% agreement
Tõnis Kõiv 100% agreement
Kalle Palling 100% agreement
Urve Tiidus 100% agreement
Mati Raidma 100% agreement
Andrei Korobeinik 100% agreement

Votes most unlike

Mihhail Stalnuhhin 21% agreement
Mailis Reps 27% agreement
Urbo Vaarmann 31% agreement
Sven Mikser 32% agreement
Helmen Kütt 35% agreement
Vladimir Velman 36% agreement
Kadri Simson 37% agreement
Andres Anvelt 37% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
23.04.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
23.04.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
22.04.2002	Päevakorra kinnitamine	Did not vote
22.04.2002	Eelnõu päevakorrast välja 937 OE	Did not vote
18.04.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
18.04.2002	Tähtaja pikendamine 118 SE	Abstained
18.04.2002	Tähtaja pikendamine 928 SE	Did not vote
17.04.2002	176. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	175. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	173. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	172. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	169. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	168. parandus	For
17.04.2002	167. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	166. parandus	For
17.04.2002	164. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	160. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	157. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	156. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	145. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	142. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	138. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	137. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	135. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	134. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	133. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	129. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	128. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	120. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	117. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	116. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	106. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	100. parandus	For
17.04.2002	99. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	94. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	92. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	90. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	88. parandus	For
17.04.2002	87. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	86. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	76. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	71. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	68. parandus	Did not vote
17.04.2002	65. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	62. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	56. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	55. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	54. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	53. parandus	Against
17.04.2002	52. parandus	Against