Reform Party

Paul-Erik Rummo

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

Terms served

1945

Policy votes

14.6%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 38%Against · 35%Abstained · 27%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

14.6%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 14.6

Present but silent % 14.6

Party loyalty % 99.1

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1945 − 1661) / 1945 = 14.6%

Registered 1945 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1945
For: 879 · Against: 782 · Abstain: 11 · Did not vote: 176 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

15.2%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 15.2

Present but silent % 15.2

Party loyalty % 99.5

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2064 − 1750) / 2064 = 15.2%

Registered 2064 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2064
For: 910 · Against: 840 · Abstain: 5 · Did not vote: 207 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

0.0%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 0.0

Present but silent % 0.0

Party loyalty % 100.0

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4 − 4) / 4 = 0.0%

Registered 4 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4
For: 4 · Against: 0 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

43.9%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 43.9

Present but silent % 43.9

Party loyalty % 92.4

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2507) / 4466 = 43.9%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1286 · Against: 1221 · Abstain: 155 · Did not vote: 1670 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Taavi Rõivas 100% agreement
Jürgen Ligi 100% agreement
Andrus Ansip 100% agreement
Tõnis Kõiv 100% agreement
Kalle Palling 100% agreement
Urve Tiidus 100% agreement
Mati Raidma 100% agreement
Andrei Korobeinik 100% agreement

Votes most unlike

Mihhail Stalnuhhin 21% agreement
Mailis Reps 27% agreement
Urbo Vaarmann 31% agreement
Sven Mikser 32% agreement
Helmen Kütt 35% agreement
Vladimir Velman 36% agreement
Kadri Simson 37% agreement
Andres Anvelt 37% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
20.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
20.11.2002	Lugemise lõpetamine	Against
19.11.2002	21. parandus	Against
19.11.2002	9. parandus	Against
19.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
19.11.2002	Tähtaja pikendamine 736 SE	For
18.11.2002	Päevakorra kinnitamine	For
18.11.2002	Tähtaja pikendamine 1044 SE	Abstained
13.11.2002	38. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	23. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	8. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	4. parandus	Did not vote
13.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
13.11.2002	3. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
13.11.2002	Arutelu katkestamine	Against
13.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
13.11.2002	10. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
13.11.2002	4. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
13.11.2002	18. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
13.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
13.11.2002	1. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	Lõpphääletus	For
13.11.2002	12. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	9. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	7. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	6. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	5. parandus	Against
13.11.2002	3. parandus	For
13.11.2002	2. parandus	For
13.11.2002	1. parandus	Did not vote
12.11.2002	13. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	12. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	11. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	10. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	9. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	8. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	7. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	5. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	4. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	2. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	1. parandus	Against
12.11.2002	Tiit Toomsalu ettepanek, tuua tänases päevakorras tema algatatud eelnõu 1155 päevakorra punktist nr	Abstained
12.11.2002	Enn Tarto ja Mõõdukate fraktsiooni ettepanek, viia tänases päevakorras punkt 11, seaduseelnõu 1169,	Against
11.11.2002	Päevakorra kinnitamine	For
11.11.2002	Eelnõu päevakorrast välja	Against
11.11.2002	Tähtaja pikendamine 1024 SE	For