RL

Reform Party

Rein Lang

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

2
Terms served
565
Policy votes
21.1%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 50%Against · 34%Abstained · 16%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

21.1%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 21.1
Present but silent % 21.1
Party loyalty % 97.3
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (565 − 446) / 565 = 21.1%

Registered 565 · Absent 0 · Votes available 565
For: 333 · Against: 113 · Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 99 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

40.8%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 40.8
Present but silent % 40.8
Party loyalty % 99.2
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1480 − 876) / 1480 = 40.8%

Registered 1480 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1480
For: 458 · Against: 418 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 148 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
2004-11-18 218. parandus Against
2004-11-18 217. parandus Against
2004-11-18 216. parandus Against
2004-11-18 215. parandus Against
2004-11-18 214. parandus Against
2004-11-18 213. parandus Against
2004-11-18 212. parandus Against
2004-11-18 211. parandus Against
2004-11-18 210. parandus Against
2004-11-18 209. parandus Against
2004-11-18 208. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 207. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 206. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 205. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 204. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 203. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 202. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 201. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 200. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 199. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 198. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 197. parandus Against
2004-11-18 196. parandus Against
2004-11-18 195. parandus Against
2004-11-18 194. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-18 193. parandus Against
2004-11-18 192. parandus Against
2004-11-18 191. parandus Against
2004-11-18 190. parandus Against
2004-11-18 189. parandus Against
2004-11-18 188. parandus Against
2004-11-18 187. parandus Against
2004-11-18 186. parandus Against
2004-11-18 185. parandus Against
2004-11-18 184. parandus Against
2004-11-18 183. parandus Against
2004-11-18 182. parandus Against
2004-11-18 180. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 179. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 178. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 174. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 173. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 172. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 171. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 169. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 168. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 167. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 166. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 165. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 164. parandus Absent