RL

Reform Party

Rein Lang

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

2
Terms served
565
Policy votes
21.1%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 50%Against · 34%Abstained · 16%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

21.1%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 21.1
Present but silent % 21.1
Party loyalty % 97.3
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (565 − 446) / 565 = 21.1%

Registered 565 · Absent 0 · Votes available 565
For: 333 · Against: 113 · Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 99 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

40.8%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 40.8
Present but silent % 40.8
Party loyalty % 99.2
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1480 − 876) / 1480 = 40.8%

Registered 1480 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1480
For: 458 · Against: 418 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 148 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
2004-11-18 163. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 162. parandus Absent
2004-11-18 161. parandus Absent
2004-11-17 160. parandus Against
2004-11-17 159. parandus Against
2004-11-17 158. parandus Against
2004-11-17 157. parandus Against
2004-11-17 156. parandus Against
2004-11-17 155. parandus Against
2004-11-17 154. parandus Against
2004-11-17 153. parandus Against
2004-11-17 152. parandus Against
2004-11-17 151. parandus Against
2004-11-17 149. parandus Against
2004-11-17 148. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 147. parandus Against
2004-11-17 146. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 145. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 144. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 143. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 142. parandus Against
2004-11-17 141. parandus Against
2004-11-17 140. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 139. parandus Against
2004-11-17 138. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 137. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 136. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 135. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 134. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 133. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 132. parandus Did not vote
2004-11-17 131. parandus Against
2004-11-17 130. parandus Against
2004-11-17 129. parandus Against
2004-11-17 128. parandus Against
2004-11-17 127. parandus Against
2004-11-17 126. parandus Against
2004-11-17 125. parandus Against
2004-11-17 124. parandus Against
2004-11-17 123. parandus Against
2004-11-17 122. parandus Against
2004-11-17 121. parandus Against
2004-11-17 120. parandus Against
2004-11-17 119. parandus Against
2004-11-17 118. parandus Against
2004-11-17 117. parandus Against
2004-11-17 116. parandus Against
2004-11-17 115. parandus Against
2004-11-17 114. parandus Against
2004-11-17 113. parandus Against