Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (507 − 340) / 507 = 32.9%
Registered 507 · Absent 0
· Votes available 507
For: 293 · Against: 47 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 114 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (948 − 411) / 948 = 56.6%
Registered 948 · Absent 0
· Votes available 948
For: 343 · Against: 68 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 169 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (738 − 520) / 738 = 29.5%
Registered 738 · Absent 0
· Votes available 738
For: 313 · Against: 207 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 90 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1800) / 2067 = 12.9%
Registered 2067 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2067
For: 894 · Against: 906 ·
Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 106 ·
Absent: 0
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Aivar Sõerd 100% agreement
- Signe Kivi 100% agreement
- Jüri Jaanson 100% agreement
- Urmas Kruuse 100% agreement
- Kalle Laanet 100% agreement
- Liina Kersna 100% agreement
- Erkki Keldo 100% agreement
- Vilja Toomast 100% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Mihhail Korb 38% agreement
- Mihhail Stalnuhhin 38% agreement
- Mart Helme 39% agreement
- Anti Poolamets 40% agreement
- Rene Kokk 41% agreement
- Jaak Valge 42% agreement
- Andrei Korobeinik 42% agreement
- Oudekki Loone 42% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 14. term | Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party |
| 13. term | Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party Switched party: Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon → Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed |
| 12. term | Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party |
| 11. term | — Non-attached |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21.04.2010 | Lükata tagasi | Absent |
| 20.04.2010 | Tööaja pikendamine | Absent |
| 20.04.2010 | Lõpphääletus | Absent |
| 20.04.2010 | Lõpphääletus | Absent |
| 19.04.2010 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | Absent |
| 15.04.2010 | Lõpphääletus | Absent |
| 14.04.2010 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 14.04.2010 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 13.04.2010 | Lükata tagasi | Absent |
| 13.04.2010 | Lükata tagasi | Absent |
| 13.04.2010 | Tööaja pikendamine | Absent |
| 13.04.2010 | Lükata tagasi | Absent |
| 13.04.2010 | Lõpphääletus | Absent |
| 13.04.2010 | Lükata tagasi | Absent |
| 12.04.2010 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 07.04.2010 | Lükata tagasi | Against |
| 07.04.2010 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 07.04.2010 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 07.04.2010 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 06.04.2010 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 06.04.2010 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 06.04.2010 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 05.04.2010 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 25.03.2010 | Nimekirja sulgemine&# Juhatuse valimine | For |
| 25.03.2010 | Nimekirja sulgemine&# Juhatuse valimine | For |
| 24.03.2010 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 24.03.2010 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 24.03.2010 | Arutelu katkestamine | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 139. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 100. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 99. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 98. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 97. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 96. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 95. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 94. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 93. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 92. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 91. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 90. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 89. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 88. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 87. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 85. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 84. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 83. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 82. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 81. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 80. parandus | Against |
| 24.03.2010 | 79. parandus | Against |