Reform Party

Väino Linde

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

Terms served

1948

Policy votes

16.1%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 43%Against · 40%Abstained · 17%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

16.1%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 16.1

Present but silent % 16.1

Party loyalty % 98.8

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1634) / 1948 = 16.1%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 861 · Against: 773 · Abstain: 10 · Did not vote: 164 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

8.3%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 8.3

Present but silent % 8.3

Party loyalty % 98.7

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1896) / 2067 = 8.3%

Registered 2067 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2067
For: 950 · Against: 946 · Abstain: 14 · Did not vote: 115 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

14.9%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 14.9

Present but silent % 14.9

Party loyalty % 99.0

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2557 − 2175) / 2557 = 14.9%

Registered 2557 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2557
For: 1067 · Against: 1108 · Abstain: 13 · Did not vote: 226 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

31.6%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 31.6

Present but silent % 31.6

Party loyalty % 98.0

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 3056) / 4466 = 31.6%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1646 · Against: 1410 · Abstain: 30 · Did not vote: 1201 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Taavi Rõivas 100% agreement
Maret Maripuu 100% agreement
Tõnis Lukas 100% agreement
Kalev Lillo 100% agreement
Andrei Korobeinik 100% agreement
Tõnu Juul 100% agreement
Terje Trei 100% agreement
Aivar Rosenberg 100% agreement

Votes most unlike

Mihhail Stalnuhhin 23% agreement
Mailis Reps 30% agreement
Urbo Vaarmann 34% agreement
Sven Mikser 35% agreement
Helmen Kütt 36% agreement
Kadri Simson 36% agreement
Vladimir Velman 37% agreement
Viktor Vassiljev 38% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
15.11.2000	234. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	233. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	232. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	229. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	227. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	224. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	223. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	221. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	220. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	219. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	218. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	210. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	209. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	208. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	206. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	205. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	204. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	201. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	192. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	190. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	189. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	181. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	174. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	169. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	163. parandus	For
15.11.2000	154. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	153. parandus	For
15.11.2000	152. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	151. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	150. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	149. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	148. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	141. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	140. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	133. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	132. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	130. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	129. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	128. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	127. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	126. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	125. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	123. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2000	122. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	121. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	120. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	119. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	118. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	116. parandus	Against
15.11.2000	115. parandus	Against