Reform Party

Väino Linde

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

Terms served

1948

Policy votes

16.1%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 43%Against · 40%Abstained · 17%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

16.1%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 16.1

Present but silent % 16.1

Party loyalty % 98.8

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1634) / 1948 = 16.1%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 861 · Against: 773 · Abstain: 10 · Did not vote: 164 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

8.3%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 8.3

Present but silent % 8.3

Party loyalty % 98.7

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1896) / 2067 = 8.3%

Registered 2067 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2067
For: 950 · Against: 946 · Abstain: 14 · Did not vote: 115 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

14.9%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 14.9

Present but silent % 14.9

Party loyalty % 99.0

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2557 − 2175) / 2557 = 14.9%

Registered 2557 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2557
For: 1067 · Against: 1108 · Abstain: 13 · Did not vote: 226 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

31.6%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 31.6

Present but silent % 31.6

Party loyalty % 98.0

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 3056) / 4466 = 31.6%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1646 · Against: 1410 · Abstain: 30 · Did not vote: 1201 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Taavi Rõivas 100% agreement
Maret Maripuu 100% agreement
Tõnis Lukas 100% agreement
Kalev Lillo 100% agreement
Andrei Korobeinik 100% agreement
Tõnu Juul 100% agreement
Terje Trei 100% agreement
Aivar Rosenberg 100% agreement

Votes most unlike

Mihhail Stalnuhhin 23% agreement
Mailis Reps 30% agreement
Urbo Vaarmann 34% agreement
Sven Mikser 35% agreement
Helmen Kütt 36% agreement
Kadri Simson 36% agreement
Vladimir Velman 37% agreement
Viktor Vassiljev 38% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
24.03.2010	83. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	82. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	81. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	80. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	79. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	78. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	77. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	76. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	75. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	74. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	73. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	72. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	71. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	70. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	69. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	68. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	67. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	66. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	65. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	64. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	63. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	62. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	61. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	60. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	59. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	58. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	57. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	56. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	55. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	54. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	53. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	52. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	51. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	50. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	49. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	48. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	47. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	46. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	44. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	43. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	42. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	41. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	40. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	39. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	38. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	37. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	36. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	35. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	34. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	34. parandus	Against