Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1709 − 617) / 1709 = 63.9%
Registered 1708 · Absent 1
· Votes available 1709
For: 440 · Against: 177 ·
Abstain: 3 · Did not vote: 802 ·
Absent: 1
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1858 − 1150) / 1858 = 38.1%
Registered 1858 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1858
For: 726 · Against: 424 ·
Abstain: 3 · Did not vote: 495 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1629 − 1167) / 1629 = 28.4%
Registered 1629 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1629
For: 731 · Against: 436 ·
Abstain: 6 · Did not vote: 264 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1558) / 1948 = 20.0%
Registered 1948 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1948
For: 825 · Against: 733 ·
Abstain: 7 · Did not vote: 260 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Urmas Reinsalu 99% agreement
- Andres Metsoja 99% agreement
- Lea Danilson-Järg 99% agreement
- Helir-Valdor Seeder 99% agreement
- Riina Solman 98% agreement
- Mart Maastik 98% agreement
- Tõnis Lukas 98% agreement
- Priit Sibul 98% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Jevgeni Ossinovski 25% agreement
- Hele Everaus 26% agreement
- Karmen Joller 27% agreement
- Hendrik Johannes Terras 29% agreement
- Igor Taro 29% agreement
- Andres Sutt 31% agreement
- Kalev Stoicescu 32% agreement
- Mati Raidma 32% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 15. term | Isamaa fraktsioon Isamaa |
| 14. term | Isamaa fraktsioon Isamaa |
| 13. term | Isamaa ja Res Publica Liidu fraktsioon Isamaa ja Res Publica Liidu fraktsioon Switched party: Isamaa ja Res Publica Liidu fraktsioon → Isamaa fraktsioon |
| 12. term | Isamaa ja Res Publica Liidu fraktsioon Isamaa ja Res Publica Liidu fraktsioon |
Votes
Born: 15.04.1960. Official's declaration (VID) ↗