Reform Party

Igor Gräzin

Voting bloc: 30 vote alike · 13. term

Terms served

1356

Policy votes

42.4%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 41%Against · 35%Abstained · 24%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

13. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

42.4%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 42.4

Present but silent % 42.4

Party loyalty % 96.3

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1356 − 781) / 1356 = 42.4%

Registered 1356 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1356
For: 505 · Against: 276 · Abstain: 6 · Did not vote: 382 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

35.9%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 35.9

Present but silent % 35.9

Party loyalty % 97.5

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1249) / 1948 = 35.9%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 647 · Against: 602 · Abstain: 6 · Did not vote: 414 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

23.3%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 23.3

Present but silent % 23.3

Party loyalty % 98.3

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1586) / 2067 = 23.3%

Registered 2067 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2067
For: 779 · Against: 807 · Abstain: 7 · Did not vote: 296 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

38.3%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 38.3

Present but silent % 38.3

Party loyalty % 97.6

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1021 − 630) / 1021 = 38.3%

Registered 1021 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1021
For: 364 · Against: 266 · Abstain: 7 · Did not vote: 219 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Kristjan Kõljalg 99% agreement
Imre Sooäär 99% agreement
Martin Kukk 99% agreement
Terje Trei 99% agreement
Andre Sepp 98% agreement
Mati Raidma 98% agreement
Remo Holsmer 98% agreement
Anne Sulling 98% agreement

Votes most unlike

Mailis Reps 27% agreement
Martin Repinski 34% agreement
Rein Randver 36% agreement
Mihhail Korb 38% agreement
Marko Pomerants 38% agreement
Jüri Ratas 38% agreement
Sven Sester 38% agreement
Karin Tammemägi 38% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
13. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
24.03.2010	90. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	89. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	88. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	87. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	85. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	84. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	83. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	82. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	81. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	80. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	79. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	78. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	77. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	76. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	75. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	74. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	73. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	72. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	71. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	70. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	69. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	68. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	67. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	66. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	65. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	64. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	63. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	62. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	61. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	60. parandus	Absent
24.03.2010	59. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	58. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	57. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	56. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	55. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	54. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	53. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	52. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	51. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	50. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	49. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	48. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	47. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	46. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	44. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	43. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	42. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	41. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	40. parandus	Against
24.03.2010	39. parandus	Against