LL

Reform Party

Lauri Luik

Voting bloc: 30 vote alike · 13. term

3
Terms served
1629
Policy votes
33.6%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 50%Against · 36%Abstained · 14%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

33.6%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 33.6
Present but silent % 33.6
Party loyalty % 98.3
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1629 − 1082) / 1629 = 33.6%

Registered 1629 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1629
For: 788 · Against: 294 · Abstain: 14 · Did not vote: 284 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

15.1%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 15.1
Present but silent % 15.1
Party loyalty % 99.1
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1654) / 1948 = 15.1%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 890 · Against: 764 · Abstain: 11 · Did not vote: 239 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9.9%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 9.9
Present but silent % 9.9
Party loyalty % 99.8
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1863) / 2067 = 9.9%

Registered 2067 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2067
For: 988 · Against: 875 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 186 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
08.12.2010 Lõpphääletus For
08.12.2010 Lõpphääletus For
08.12.2010 Lõpphääletus For
08.12.2010 Lõpphääletus For
08.12.2010 Lõpphääletus For
08.12.2010 Lõpphääletus For
08.12.2010 Lõpphääletus For
08.12.2010 Lõpphääletus For
08.12.2010 Lõpphääletus For
08.12.2010 Lükata tagasi For
06.12.2010 Päevakorra kinnitamine For
25.11.2010 Lõpphääletus For
25.11.2010 Lõpphääletus For
25.11.2010 Lõpphääletus For
25.11.2010 Lõpphääletus For
25.11.2010 Lõpphääletus For
25.11.2010 Lõpphääletus For
24.11.2010 15. parandus Against
24.11.2010 6. parandus Against
24.11.2010 4. parandus Against
24.11.2010 4. parandus Against
24.11.2010 4. parandus Against
24.11.2010 1. parandus Against
24.11.2010 Arutelu katkestamine Against
24.11.2010 Arutelu katkestamine Did not vote
24.11.2010 20. parandus Did not vote
24.11.2010 Lõpphääletus For
24.11.2010 Lõpphääletus For
24.11.2010 Lükata tagasi For
23.11.2010 Lükata tagasi For
23.11.2010 Arutelu katkestamine Against
23.11.2010 Lõpphääletus For
23.11.2010 126. parandus Against
23.11.2010 125. parandus Against
23.11.2010 124. parandus Against
23.11.2010 123. parandus Against
23.11.2010 122. parandus Against
23.11.2010 121. parandus Against
23.11.2010 120. parandus Against
23.11.2010 119. parandus Against
23.11.2010 118. parandus Against
23.11.2010 117. parandus Against
23.11.2010 116. parandus Against
23.11.2010 115. parandus Against
23.11.2010 114. parandus Against
23.11.2010 113. parandus Against
23.11.2010 112. parandus Against
23.11.2010 111. parandus Against
23.11.2010 110. parandus Against
23.11.2010 109. parandus Against