Reform Party

Paul-Erik Rummo

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

Terms served

1945

Policy votes

14.6%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 38%Against · 35%Abstained · 27%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

14.6%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 14.6

Present but silent % 14.6

Party loyalty % 99.1

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1945 − 1661) / 1945 = 14.6%

Registered 1945 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1945
For: 879 · Against: 782 · Abstain: 11 · Did not vote: 176 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

15.2%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 15.2

Present but silent % 15.2

Party loyalty % 99.5

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2064 − 1750) / 2064 = 15.2%

Registered 2064 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2064
For: 910 · Against: 840 · Abstain: 5 · Did not vote: 207 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

0.0%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 0.0

Present but silent % 0.0

Party loyalty % 100.0

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4 − 4) / 4 = 0.0%

Registered 4 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4
For: 4 · Against: 0 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

43.9%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 43.9

Present but silent % 43.9

Party loyalty % 92.4

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2507) / 4466 = 43.9%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1286 · Against: 1221 · Abstain: 155 · Did not vote: 1670 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Taavi Rõivas 100% agreement
Jürgen Ligi 100% agreement
Andrus Ansip 100% agreement
Tõnis Kõiv 100% agreement
Kalle Palling 100% agreement
Urve Tiidus 100% agreement
Mati Raidma 100% agreement
Andrei Korobeinik 100% agreement

Votes most unlike

Mihhail Stalnuhhin 21% agreement
Mailis Reps 27% agreement
Urbo Vaarmann 31% agreement
Sven Mikser 32% agreement
Helmen Kütt 35% agreement
Vladimir Velman 36% agreement
Kadri Simson 37% agreement
Andres Anvelt 37% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
15.11.2001	Lõpphääletus	Did not vote
15.11.2001	3. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	2. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2001	1. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2001	Lõpphääletus	Did not vote
15.11.2001	286. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	285. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	284. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	283. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	282. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	280. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	279. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	278. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	277. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	276. parandus	For
15.11.2001	275. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	274. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	251. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	248. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	247. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	237. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	234. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	231. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	229. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	213. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	212. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	210. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	209. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2001	208. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	206. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	200. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	199. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	198. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	197. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	196. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	177. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	166. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	157. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	156. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	153. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	152. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	150. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	147. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	132. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	131. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	130. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	129. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	127. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	126. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	125. parandus	Against