Reform Party

Paul-Erik Rummo

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

Terms served

1945

Policy votes

14.6%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 38%Against · 35%Abstained · 27%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

14.6%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 14.6

Present but silent % 14.6

Party loyalty % 99.1

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1945 − 1661) / 1945 = 14.6%

Registered 1945 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1945
For: 879 · Against: 782 · Abstain: 11 · Did not vote: 176 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

15.2%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 15.2

Present but silent % 15.2

Party loyalty % 99.5

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2064 − 1750) / 2064 = 15.2%

Registered 2064 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2064
For: 910 · Against: 840 · Abstain: 5 · Did not vote: 207 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

0.0%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 0.0

Present but silent % 0.0

Party loyalty % 100.0

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4 − 4) / 4 = 0.0%

Registered 4 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4
For: 4 · Against: 0 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

43.9%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 43.9

Present but silent % 43.9

Party loyalty % 92.4

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2507) / 4466 = 43.9%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1286 · Against: 1221 · Abstain: 155 · Did not vote: 1670 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Taavi Rõivas 100% agreement
Jürgen Ligi 100% agreement
Andrus Ansip 100% agreement
Tõnis Kõiv 100% agreement
Kalle Palling 100% agreement
Urve Tiidus 100% agreement
Mati Raidma 100% agreement
Andrei Korobeinik 100% agreement

Votes most unlike

Mihhail Stalnuhhin 21% agreement
Mailis Reps 27% agreement
Urbo Vaarmann 31% agreement
Sven Mikser 32% agreement
Helmen Kütt 35% agreement
Vladimir Velman 36% agreement
Kadri Simson 37% agreement
Andres Anvelt 37% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
15.11.2001	124. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	123. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	122. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	121. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	116. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	114. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2001	112. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	111. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	110. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	109. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	108. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	107. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	104. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	92. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	90. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	89. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	87. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	74. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	73. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	64. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	63. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	62. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	61. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	59. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	58. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	57. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2001	56. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	53. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	50. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	49. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	48. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2001	47. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	46. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	44. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	42. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	41. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	40. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	38. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	37. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	26. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	23. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	21. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	15. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	14. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	9. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	6. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	5. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	3. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	2. parandus	Against
14.11.2001	1. parandus	Against