Reform Party

Peep Aru

Voting bloc: 5 vote alike · 13. term

Terms served

416

Policy votes

35.3%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 47%Against · 43%Abstained · 10%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

13. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party Switched party: Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed → Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon

35.3%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 35.3

Present but silent % 35.3

Party loyalty % 97.6

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (416 − 269) / 416 = 35.3%

Registered 416 · Absent 0 · Votes available 416
For: 226 · Against: 43 · Abstain: 5 · Did not vote: 96 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

12.0%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 12.0

Present but silent % 12.0

Party loyalty % 98.9

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1714) / 1948 = 12.0%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 941 · Against: 773 · Abstain: 4 · Did not vote: 219 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

9.3%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 9.3

Present but silent % 9.3

Party loyalty % 99.6

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1874) / 2067 = 9.3%

Registered 2067 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2067
For: 939 · Against: 935 · Abstain: 4 · Did not vote: 114 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

11.1%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 11.1

Present but silent % 11.1

Party loyalty % 99.7

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1536 − 1365) / 1536 = 11.1%

Registered 1536 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1536
For: 615 · Against: 750 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 147 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Mati Raidma 99% agreement
Kalle Laanet 99% agreement
Vilja Toomast 99% agreement
Taavi Rõivas 99% agreement
Urve Tiidus 99% agreement
Kalle Palling 99% agreement
Laine Randjärv 99% agreement
Hanno Pevkur 98% agreement

Votes most unlike

Jevgeni Ossinovski 56% agreement
Inara Luigas 64% agreement
Martin Helme 65% agreement
Rainer Vakra 65% agreement
Karin Tammemägi 66% agreement
Mihhail Korb 66% agreement
Mihhail Stalnuhhin 66% agreement
Hannes Hanso 66% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
13. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party Switched party: Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed → Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
11.12.2008	140. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	139. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	137. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	136. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	134. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	133. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	131. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	130. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	129. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	128. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	127. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	126. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	125. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	124. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	123. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	122. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	121. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	120. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	119. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	118. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	116. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	115. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	114. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	113. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	112. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	111. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	110. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	109. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	108. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	107. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	106. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	104. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	103. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	102. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	101. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	100. parandus	Did not vote
11.12.2008	99. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	98. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	97. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	96. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	95. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	94. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	93. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	92. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	91. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	90. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	89. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	88. parandus	Against
11.12.2008	87. parandus	Did not vote
11.12.2008	86. parandus	Against